New insights into the antagonistic effect of AMF and SOB: A preliminary study on the ability of Funneliformis mosseae to inhibit sulfur oxidation by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans

Antagonistic Effects of AMF and SOB in Soybean Rhizosphere: New Insights into Soil Microbial Interactions

Soil Microbial Interactions: AMF vs. SOB in Soybean Rhizosphere

Soil health and crop productivity often depend on complex interactions between plants and soil microorganisms. Two important microbial groups—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB)—play key roles in nutrient cycling and soil fertility.

Traditionally, AMF and SOB are believed to act synergistically, enhancing nutrient uptake and plant growth. However, a new study investigating their combined effects in sulfur-deficient, acidified soybean soils revealed a surprising antagonistic relationship that challenges previous assumptions.


Key Findings: When Allies Turn into Adversaries

The research explored interactions between Funneliformis mosseae (AMF) and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (SOB) in soybean rhizosphere soils under continuous cropping.

1. Reduced Soybean Growth Under Co-Inoculation

  • Inoculating AMF alone improved soybean height, dry weight, and available soil sulfur.
  • SOB alone or combined with AMF inhibited plant growth, suggesting antagonistic interactions under acidic, sulfur-deficient conditions.

2. Decline in Sulfur Cycling Genes

  • AMF alone increased the abundance of sulfur-related genes (dsrA, soxY, yedZ, apsA).
  • SOB alone or co-inoculation reduced these genes, limiting sulfur oxidation efficiency in soils.

3. Impact of Soil pH and Microbial Secretions

  • High fructose and glucose levels secreted by AMF roots inhibited SOB growth.
  • Acidic conditions and excess carbon sources disrupted SOB’s autotrophic metabolism, lowering sulfur oxidation capacity.

Why This Matters for Agriculture

Continuous soybean cropping often leads to:

  • Sulfur depletion in soils
  • Soil acidification due to fertilizer overuse
  • Reduced crop yields and soil fertility

This study suggests that microbial interactions are context-dependent. While AMF can boost nutrient uptake and soil fertility, their combined use with SOB may not always be beneficial, especially in acidic, sulfur-deficient soils.

Towards Sustainable Soil Management

The findings highlight the need to:

  • Tailor microbial inoculant strategies to soil pH, nutrient status, and crop requirements
  • Study carbon exudation effects on soil microbial communities
  • Develop integrated soil fertility approaches for sustainable farming

Conclusion: Rethinking Microbial Fertilizers

The research provides new insights into plant-microbe-soil interactions, showing that AMF and SOB may compete rather than cooperate under certain conditions.

Future studies should explore:

  • How to balance microbial interactions for better nutrient cycling
  • The role of carbon exudates in shaping soil microbial networks
  • Field-scale validation of microbial inoculant performance

These findings could help farmers and soil scientists design eco-friendly, site-specific soil fertility management practices for sustainable agriculture.

Reference

Pan, L., Chen, J., Wang, L., & Cai, B. (2025). New insights into the antagonistic effect of AMF and SOB: A preliminary study on the ability of Funneliformis mosseae to inhibit sulfur oxidation by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07885-7

Share
Pin Share

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply